MIL-STD-810G 环境工程考量与实验室测试

VIP专免

老杨树 2024-10-07 250 23.91MB 804 页 20星币

侵权投诉

NOT MEASUREMENT

SENSITIVE

MIL-STD-810G

31 October 2008

SUPERSEDING

MIL-STD-810F

1 January 2000

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

TEST METHOD STANDARD

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS

AND LABORATORY TESTS

AMSC N/A AREA ENVR

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

MIL-STD-810G

PART ONE

FOREWORD

1. This standard is approved for use by all Departments and Agencies of the Department of Defense (DoD).

Although prepared specifically for DoD applications, this standard may be tailored for commercial applications as

well. While MIL-STD-810F incorporated a significant revision of MIL-STD-810E, MIL-STD-810G not only

consolidates the basic -810F with its three change notices to result in one comprehensive document, but also

includes a number of corrections, significant changes, and additions to the comprehensive -810F, to include five

new test methods, one of which (Method 526) was extracted from Method 516. The primary emphases are still the

same – (with the exception of Method 528) tailoring a materiel item's environmental design and test limits to the

conditions that the specific materiel will experience throughout its service life, and establishing laboratory test

methods that replicate the effects of environments on materiel, rather than trying to reproduce the environments

themselves. However, the "G" revision continues the up-front explanation of how to implement the environmental

tailoring process throughout the materiel acquisition cycle.

As in MIL-STD-810F, this revision recognizes that the environmental design and test tailoring process has

expanded to involve a wide range of managerial and technical interests. Accordingly, this revision orients

environmental design and test direction toward three basic types of users who have distinctly different, although

closely associated, interests: program managers who, among other responsibilities, ensure proposed concepts and

systems are valid and functional in intended operational environments; environmental engineering specialists (EES),

who enter the acquisition process early to assist combat and materiel developer tailoring efforts by preparing life cycle

environmental profiles and drafting tailored design criteria and test programs; and the design, test, and evaluation

community, whose analysts, engineers, and facility operators use tailored designs and tests to meet user needs.

2. Part One describes management, engineering, and technical roles in the environmental design and test tailoring

process. It focuses on the process of tailoring materiel design and test criteria to the specific environmental

conditions a materiel item is likely to encounter during its service life. New appendices support the succinctly

presented text of Part One. Annex A contains complete descriptions of environmental engineering tasks. These

tasks, along with management information in Annex B and EES guidance in Annex C, will help to ensure the

environmental design and test tailoring process is implemented and documented according to the disciplined, but

flexible approach to materiel acquisition called for in Department of Defense (DoD) 5000-series documents (DoDD

5000.1). Terms used in this standard relating to the materiel acquisition process are limited to terms used in the

DoD 5000-series documents; to avoid confusion and promote simplicity, service-specific terms/processes are not

used.

3. Part Two contains environmental laboratory test methods to be applied according to the general and specific test

tailoring guidelines described in Part One. It is important to emphasize that, with the exception of Method 528,

these methods are not to be called out in blanket fashion, nor applied as unalterable routines, but are to be selected

and tailored to generate the most relevant test data possible.

To support the tailoring process described in Part One, each test method in Part Two contains some environmental

data and references, and identifies tailoring opportunities for the particular method. Some methods afford a wide

latitude for tailoring; some can be tailored up to established limits, and some have relatively few tailoring options.

Whenever possible, each method contains background rationale to help determine the appropriate level of tailoring.

Each test method supports the test engineer and test facility operator by describing preferred laboratory test

facilities and methodologies. Any specific tailoring information and values contained in these test methods should

be supplanted by more up-to-date field/fleet or program-specific information when available.

When applied properly, the environmental management and engineering processes described in this standard can be

of enormous value in generating confidence in the environmental worthiness and overall durability of materiel

system design. However, it is important to recognize that there are limitations inherent in laboratory testing that

make it imperative to use proper caution and engineering judgment when extrapolating these laboratory results to

results that may be obtained under actual service conditions. In many cases, real-world environmental stresses

(singularly or in combination) cannot be duplicated practically or reliably in test laboratories. Therefore, users

should not assume that a system or component that passes laboratory tests of this standard also would pass

field/fleet verification trials. DoD 5000-series documents call for component technology to be demonstrated in

PART ONE-ii

MIL-STD-810G

PART ONE

relevant environments to reduce risk on components and subsystems that have been demonstrated only in laboratory

environments (DoDI 5000.2).

4. Part Three contains a compendium of climatic data and guidance assembled from several sources to include AR

70-38, “Research, Development, Test and Evaluation of Materiel for Extreme Climatic Conditions,” (1979), Draft

AR 70-38 (1990) that was assembled using 1987 Air Land Battlefield Environment (ALBE) report information,

“Environmental Factors and Standards for Atmospheric Obscurants, Climate, and Terrain,” and MIL-HDBK-310,

Global Climatic Data for Developing Military Products.

Part Three provides planning guidance for realistic consideration (starting points) of climatic conditions in the

research, development, test, and evaluation (RDTE) of materiel and materials used throughout their life cycles in

various climatic regions throughout the world. It is intended that this and related documents will help achieve the

objective of developing materiel that will perform adequately under the environmental conditions likely to be found

throughout its life cycle in the areas of intended use.

5. The US Department of Defense would like to thank the following individuals for their contributions toward the

development and publication of MIL-STD-810G:

Army Air Force

Jimmie Barnett – Dugway Proving Ground Dwayne Bell – Eglin AFB

Michael Barry – Aberdeen Test Center Cheryl Copes – ASC/ENRS, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

William (Skip) Connon– Aberdeen Test Center Lorraine Wright – ASC/ENRS, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Jeff Dallman – White Sands Missile Range Faustino Zapata – ASC/ENFS, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Herb Egbert – ECIII, YPG

Rick Errhalt – Electronic Proving Ground Navy

Judy Galloway – Aberdeen Test Center Brian Haugen – NAWC, China Lake

Mike Hale – Redstone Technical Test Center James E. Howell III – NSWC

John Harris – Redstone Technical Test Center Al Kukk – Navy Consultant

Al Kelley – YPG-NETO Ron Merritt – Naval Air Warfare Center, China Lake

Robert Kerr – SDDC, Ft Eustis Richard F. Taddeo – NAVSEA 05P12

Paul Krause – COE, TEC Brett Tanner – Naval Air Warfare Center, China Lake

Bob McKinnon – Aberdeen Test Center

Joe Nash – AMRDEC Private Industry

Randy Patrick – Yuma Test Center Vesta Bateman – Mechanical Shock Consulting

Chris Reeks – Redstone Technical Test Center George Coonley – KHS Tech. Lighting

Rick Reynaud – White Sands Missile Range Gus Cutting – Honeywell

Linda Spears– YPG-NETO

Jamie Sullivan – Redstone Technical Test Center Organizations

Ken Thompson – DTC-NETO, APG IEST – Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

Scott Walton – Aberdeen Test Center SAVIAC – Shock and Vibration Information Analysis Center

The MIL-STD-810G Working Group wishes to recognize with great appreciation Mr. Ken Thompson, MIL-STD-

810G Committee Chairman, for his exemplary leadership, guidance, and dedication to bringing this collaborative

project to fruition.

PART ONE-iii

文档加载中……请稍候！
如果长时间未打开，您也可以点击刷新试试。

下载文档到电脑，查找使用更方便

亲，本站95%以上的标准规范都面向会员免费，办理VIP会员下载更省钱，平均每篇不到2元

立即下载 VIP免费下载

标签： #国防领域 #国防装备 #环境适应性测试方法

摘要：

MIL-STD-810G环境工程考量与实验室测试ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTS，由美国国防部DoD发布的标准，是国防领域环境测试的核心参考。其主要内容是：国防装备（如武器、电子设备、车辆等）需通过的环境适应性测试方法，包括温度、湿度、振动、冲击、盐雾、沙尘等环境条件的模拟测试；装备在极端环境下的可靠性、耐久性评估要求，确保其能在实战/任务环境中正常运行。

展开>> 收起<<

MIL-STD-810G 环境工程考量与实验室测试.pdf

共804页,预览4页

还剩页未读，继续阅读

声明：本文档系会员上传，若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私，请立即通知，我们立即给予侵权申诉删除！

MIL-STD-810G 环境工程考量与实验室测试

相关推荐

开通VIP享超值会员特权

相关内容

热门标签

举报选择: