10. Calibration and Standardization
10.1 Ensure that all of the manufacturer’s instructions for
calibrating, checking, and operating the apparatus are fol-
lowed.
10.2 A sample with a well-documented cloud point can be
used to verify the performance of the automatic apparatus.
Alternatively, a sample that has been extensively tested in a
cloud point cross-check program can be used. Such verification
materials can also be prepared from intracompany cross-
checks.
11. Procedure
11.1 Pour the sample specimen into the test jar to the scribed
mark. When necessary, heat the sample in a bath or oven until
it is just sufficiently fluid to pour into the test jar. Samples with
an expected cloud point above 36 °C or samples which appear
solid at room temperature can be heated above 45 °C, but they
shall not be heated above 60 °C.
11.2 Insert the charged test jar into the metallic block bath,
and install the test jar cap assembly snugly.
11.3 Enter the expected cloud point and start the operation
of the apparatus according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
From this point on, the apparatus automatically controls the
series of procedures, which includes the sample preheating
function if the apparatus is so programmed prior to the start of
the automatic procedure. (Warning—Exercise care when se-
lecting the preheating temperature. Samples which are fluid at
ambient room temperature can also have a low flash point. Use
higher preheating temperatures only on samples known to be
solid near ambient room temperature.)
11.4 After the sample preheating is completed, the metallic
block bath is cooled down automatically at a typical rate of
3 °C to 4 °C ⁄min. At a temperature at least 20 °C above the
expected cloud point, the cooling rate slows down to 0.8 °C to
1.1 °C ⁄min. During the cooling, the optical system monitors
for appearance of the crystals.
11.5 In the event a cloud point is detected prematurely
during the fast cooling rate, as determined by the apparatus, the
specimen shall be reheated to a higher temperature, at least
30 °C warmer than the temperature of premature detection, and
then cooled as described in 11.4, while the optical system
monitors for appearance of the crystals.
11.6 At the detection of the cloud point, the specimen
temperature is displayed to the nearest 0.1 °C and held on the
digital display. The metallic block bath starts heating automati-
cally for the next test.
12. Report
12.1 Report the temperature recorded in 11.6 to 0.1 °C as
the cloud point D7683 (Small Test Jar Method).
12.2 When specified, correct the results recorded in 11.6
with the relative bias in accordance with 13.3, then round to the
next lower integer (a colder temperature) and report as the Test
Method D2500 equivalent cloud point in accordance with Test
Method D7683.
13. Precision and Bias
4
13.1 Precision—The precision of this test method as deter-
mined by the statistical examination of the interlaboratory test
results is as follows:
13.1.1 Repeatability—The difference between successive
test results, obtained by the same operator using the same
apparatus under constant operating conditions on identical test
material, would in the long run, in the normal and correct
operation of this test method, exceed the following only in one
case in twenty.
1.47 °C, valid range –50 °C to +6 °C
13.1.2 Reproducibility—The difference between two single
and independent test results, obtained by different operators
working in different laboratories on identical test material,
would in the long run, in normal and correct operation of this
test method, exceed the following only in one case in twenty.
2.45 °C, valid range –50 °C to +6 °C
13.2 Bias—Since there is no accepted reference material
suitable for determining the bias for the procedure in this test
method, bias has not been determined.
13.3 Relative Bias—The Degree of Agreement between
results by Test Method D7683 and Test Method D2500/
IP219—Results on the same materials produced by Test
Method D7683 and Test Method D2500 have been assessed in
accordance with procedures outlined in Practice D6708. The
findings are:
The degree of agreement between results from Test Method
D7683 and Test Method D2500/IP219 can be further improved
by applying the bias correction outlined in Eq 1. Sample-
specific bias, as defined in Practice D6708, was observed for
some samples after applying the bias correction.
Predicted Y
~
D2500
!
5bias 2corrected X
~
D7683
!
5X
~
D7683
!
11.68°C (1)
where:
X= result obtained by Test Method D7683,
and
bias-corrected X = predicted Y= result that would have
been obtained by Test Method D2500/
IP219 on the same sample.
Differences between bias-corrected results from Eq 1 and
Test Method D2500/IP219, for the sample types and property
ranges studied, are expected to exceed the following between
method reproducibility (R
XY
), as defined in Practice D6708,
about 5 % of the time.
R
XY
53.51 °C (2)
13.4 The precision statements were derived from a 2009
interlaboratory cooperative test program.
4
Participants ana-
lyzed 21 sample sets comprised of six distillate fuels, six base
oil stocks, three biodiesel (derived from soy, canola, and
tallow), and six blends of biodiesel in distillate fuel represent-
ing B5, B10, and B20 blends. The cloud point temperature
4
Supporting data have been filed at ASTM International Headquarters and may
be obtained by requesting Research Report RR:D02-1715. Contact ASTM Customer
Service at service@astm.org.
D7683 − 21
3