MIL STD-810H-2022 含Change 1 美军标环境可靠性试验标准

VIP专享

老杨树 2025-01-19 344 36.18MB 1107 页 20星币

侵权投诉

NOT MEASUREMENT

SENSITIVE

MIL-STD-810H

w/Change 1

18 May 2022

SUPERSEDING

MIL-STD-810H

31 January 2019

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

TEST METHOD STANDARD

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS

AND LABORATORY TESTS

AMSC 10312 AREA ENVR

MIL-STD-810H

w/CHANGE 1

PART ONE

PART ONE-ii

FOREWORD

1. This Standard is approved for use by all Departments and Agencies of the Department of Defense (DoD). Although

prepared specifically for DoD applications, this Standard may be tailored for commercial applications as well. This

Change Notice to version G incorporates updates and clarifications to the earlier edition. The primary emphases are

still the same - (with the exception of Method 528) tailoring a materiel item's environmental design and test limits to

the conditions that the specific materiel will experience throughout its service life, and establishing laboratory test

methods that replicate the effects of environments on materiel, rather than trying to reproduce the environments

themselves. The goal is to provide an up-front explanation of how to implement the environmental tailoring process

throughout the materiel acquisition cycle.

This revision recognizes that the environmental design and test tailoring process has expanded to involve a wide range

of managerial and technical interests. Accordingly, this revision orients environmental design and test direction

toward three basic types of users who have distinctly different, although closely associated, interests: Program

Managers who, among other responsibilities, ensure proposed concepts and systems are valid and functional in intended

operational environments; environmental engineering specialists (EES), who enter the acquisition process early to assist

combat and materiel developer tailoring efforts by preparing life cycle environmental profiles and drafting tailored design

criteria and test programs; and the design, test, and evaluation community, whose analysts, engineers, and facility

operators use tailored designs and tests to meet user needs.

2. Part One describes management, engineering, and technical roles in the environmental design and test tailoring

process. It focuses on the process of tailoring materiel design and test criteria to the specific environmental conditions

a materiel item is likely to encounter during its service life. Annex A contains complete descriptions of environmental

engineering tasks, including additional guidance on Task 402, Life Cycle Environmental Profile (LCEP). These tasks,

along with management information in Annex B and EES guidance in Annex C, will help to ensure the environmental

design and test tailoring process is implemented and documented according to the disciplined, but flexible approach

to materiel acquisition called for in Department of Defense (DoD) 5000-series documents (DoDD 5000.01). Terms

used in this Standard relating to the materiel acquisition process are limited to terms used in the DoD 5000-series

documents; to avoid confusion and promote simplicity, service-specific terms/processes are not used.

3. Part Two contains environmental laboratory test methods to be applied according to the general and specific test

tailoring guidelines described in Part One. It is important to emphasize that, with the exception of Method 528, these

Methods are not to be called out in blanket fashion, nor applied as unalterable routines, but are to be selected and

tailored to generate the most relevant test data possible. Methods 500 through 527 now contain the Note, “Tailoring

is essential. Select methods, procedures and parameter levels based on the tailoring process described in Part One,

paragraph 4.2.2, and Annex C. Apply the general guidelines for laboratory test methods described in Part One,

paragraph 5 of this Standard.” Prior to the start of testing, all deviations as a result of tailoring shall be approved by

the proper authorities. It should further be noted that the rationale for such deviations and/or tailoring shall be recorded

in the test report.

To support the tailoring process described in Part One, each test method in Part Two contains some environmental

data and references, and identifies tailoring opportunities for the particular method. Some methods afford a wide

latitude for tailoring; some can be tailored up to established limits, and some have relatively few tailoring options.

Whenever possible, each method contains background rationale to help determine the appropriate level of tailoring.

Each test method supports the test engineer and test facility operator by describing preferred laboratory test facilities

and methodologies. Any specific tailoring information and values contained in these test methods should be

supplanted by more up-to-date field/fleet or program-specific information when available.

When applied properly, the environmental management and engineering processes described in this Standard can be

of enormous value in generating confidence in the environmental worthiness and overall durability of materiel system

design. However, it is important to recognize that there are limitations inherent in laboratory testing that make it

imperative to use proper caution and engineering judgment when extrapolating these laboratory results to results that

may be obtained under actual service conditions. In many cases, real-world environmental stresses (singularly or in

combination) cannot be duplicated practically or reliably in test laboratories. Therefore, users should not assume that

a system or component that passes laboratory tests of this Standard also would pass field/fleet verification trials. DoD

5000-series documents call for component technology to be demonstrated in relevant environments to reduce risk on

components and subsystems that have been demonstrated only in laboratory environments (DoDI 5000.02).

MIL-STD-810H

w/CHANGE 1

PART ONE

PART ONE-iii

4. Part Three contains a compendium of climatic data and guidance assembled from several sources to include AR

70-38, “Research, Development, Test and Evaluation of Materiel for Extreme Climatic Conditions,” (1979), Draft AR

70-38 (1990) that was assembled using 1987 Air Land Battlefield Environment (ALBE) report information,

“Environmental Factors and Standards for Atmospheric Obscurants, Climate, and Terrain,” and MIL-HDBK-310,

Global Climatic Data for Developing Military Products.

Part Three provides planning guidance for realistic consideration (starting points) of climatic conditions in the

research, development, test, and evaluation (RDTE) of materiel and materials used throughout their life cycles in

various climatic regions throughout the world. It is intended that this and related documents will help achieve the

objective of developing materiel that will perform adequately under the environmental conditions likely to be found

throughout its life cycle in the areas of intended use.

5. The US Department of Defense would like to thank the following individuals for their contributions toward the

development and publication of MIL-STD-810H Change Notice 1:

Army Air Force

Erick Acosta – White Sands Missile Range Dwayne Bell – Eglin AFB

Byron Alexander – Electronic Proving Ground Diane Buhrmaster – AFRL

Michael Barry – Aberdeen Test Center Cheryl Copes – ASC/ENRS, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

William (Bill) Barber – Redstone Test Center Lorraine Wright – ASC/ENRS, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Michael Bartosiak – SDDCTEA, Scott AFB Sean Mortara – ASC/ENFS, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Michael (Troy) Bedsole – Redstone Test Center

Daniel Bell – Redstone Test Center Navy

Thomas Considine – ARL, APG James E. Howell III – NSWC

Victoria Eveningred – Electronic Proving Ground Andrew Johnson – NSWC, Dahlgren

Mike Hale – Redstone Test Center Wayne Johnson – NAWC, Patuxent River

Anthony Ham – ATEC, APG Ron Merritt – NAWC, China Lake

Mark Horst – White Sands Missile Range Luke Martin – NSWC, Dahlgren

Matthew Lucas – Redstone Test Center Kevin Kovaleski – NAS, Patuxent River

Joe Nash – AMRDEC Edward Lipnickas – NAWC, Patuxent River

Randy Patrick – Yuma Test Center

Steve Sanders – AMRDEC OSD

Brendt Sigvart – Dugway Proving Ground Stephen Spadafora – OSD/CPO (Leidos)

Jamie Sullivan – Redstone Test Center

Eric Tessier – White Sands Missile Range Private Industry

Ken Thompson – ATEC, APG Vesta Bateman – Mechanical Shock Consulting

Weston Wilson – Aberdeen Test Center

Organizations

IEST – Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

SAVE – Shock and Vibration Exchange

The MIL-STD-810 Working Group wishes to recognize with great appreciation Mr. Ken Thompson, MIL-STD-810

Committee Chairman, for his exemplary leadership, guidance, and dedication to bringing this collaborative project to

fruition.

文档加载中……请稍候！
如果长时间未打开，您也可以点击刷新试试。

下载文档到电脑，查找使用更方便

亲，本站95%以上的标准规范都面向会员免费，办理VIP会员下载更省钱，平均每篇不到2元

立即下载

摘要：

MIL STD-810H-2022 含Change 1 美军标环境可靠性试验标准是当前美军及国际军工、高端制造业广泛采用的环境适应性测试权威规范。该标准针对装备在极端温度、湿度、振动、冲击、沙尘、盐雾、低压、太阳辐射等复杂环境下的耐久性与可靠性提出了详细的测试方法与实验室管理要求。本次发布的2022版本包含Change 1更新，进一步优化了测试程序、设备校准条件及数据记录规范，提升了对新型材料与电子系统在严苛工况下失效模式评估的准确性。适用于航空航天、国防电子、汽车及通讯设备等行业的环境试验验证

展开>> 收起<<

MIL STD-810H-2022 含Change 1 美军标环境可靠性试验标准.pdf

共1107页,预览4页

还剩页未读，继续阅读

声明：本文档系会员上传，若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私，请立即通知，我们立即给予侵权申诉删除！

MIL STD-810H-2022 含Change 1 美军标环境可靠性试验标准

相关推荐

开通VIP享超值会员特权

相关内容

热门标签

举报选择: