
Copyright © 2022 American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists
AATCC Manual of International Test Methods and Procedures/2023 AATCC TM8-2016e(2022)e 23
Each of 3 raters independently rated the
stained crocking cloth squares using both
the Gray Scale for Staining and the
AATCC 9-Step Chromatic Transference
Scale. The original data is on file at the
AATCC Technical Center.
13.1.1 The components of variance as
standard deviations of the Gray Scale for
Staining or AATCC 9-Step Chromatic
Transference Scale rating units are given
in Table I.
13.1.2 Critical differences are given in
Table II.
13.1.3 Example for determining be-
tween laboratory differences using one
observer and the chromatic scale are
given in Table III.
Interpretation: For the dry crock test,
since the difference between labs is less
than the critical differences in Table II
(0.82), the difference in results is not sig-
nificant. For the wet crock test, since the
difference between labs is greater than
the critical difference (1.53), the differ-
ence in results is significant.
13.2 Bias. The true value of colorfast-
ness to crocking can only be defined in
terms of a test method. Within this limita-
tion, this test method has no known bias.
14. Notes
14.1 For carpets, AATCC TM165, Test
Method for Colorfastness to Crocking: Car-
pets—Crockmeter, under the jurisdiction of
Committee RA57, Floor Covering Test Meth-
ods, should be used.
14.2 For prints where the singling out of ar-
eas too small to test with the standard crock-
meter is necessary (see AATCC TM116, Test
Method for Colorfastness to Cracking: Rotary
Vertical Crockmeter). Specimens tested by
both test methods may show dissimilar results.
There is no known correlation between the
two methods.
14.3 For potential equipment information
pertaining to this test method, please visit
the online AATCC Buyer’s Guide at www.
aatcc.org/bg. AATCC provides the possibility
of listing equipment and materials sold by its
Corporate members, but AATCC does not
qualify, or in any way approve, endorse or cer-
tify that any of the listed equipment or
materials meets the requirements in its test
methods.
14.4 The crockmeter provides a reciprocat-
ing rubbing motion simulating the action of a
human finger and forearm.
The crockmeter is so designed that the 16 ±
0.3 mm diameter finger moves back and forth,
with each complete turn of the crank, in a
straight line along a 104 ± 3 mm track on the
specimen, with a downward force of 9 ± 0.9 N
(2 ± 0.2 lb).
14.5 AATCC Crocking Cloth should meet
the following specifications:
Fiber 100% 10.3-16.8 mm combed
cotton staple with no optical
brightener present
Yarn 15 tex (40/1 cotton count),
5.9 turns/cm “z”
Thread count for greige fabric 32 ± 5 warp
ends/cm: 33 ± 5 filling picks/
cm
Weave 1/1 plain
Finished fabric desized and bleached with no
optical brightener or finish-
ing material present
pH 7 ± 1
Mass/sq meter 100 ± 3 g finished
Whiteness W = 78 ± 3 (AATCC TM110)
14.5.1 CAUTION: ISO crock test cloth re-
sults may not be equivalent to AATCC crock-
ing cloth results/values based on crocking
cloth study.
14.6 The AATCC 9-Step Chromatic Trans-
ference Scale, Gray Scale for Staining and the
White AATCC Textile Blotting Paper are
available from AATCC, P.O. Box 12215, Re-
search Triangle Park NC 27709; tel:
+1.919.549.8141; fax: +1.919.549.8933; e-
mail: ordering@aatcc.org; web site: www.aatcc.
org.
14.7 For a discussion of crock testing, see
the article by J. Patton, “Crock Test Problems
can be Prevented,” Textile Chemist and Color-
ist, Vol. 21, No. 3, March 1989, p13; and “Test-
ing for Crocking: Some Problems and Pitfalls”
by Allan E. Gore, Textile Chemists and Color-
ists, Vol. 21, No. 3, March 1989, p17.
14.8 Accidental damage to the rubbing fin-
ger, spiral clip or abrasive paper should be
repaired as follows: neatly renew the abrasive
paper; bend the clip further open or shut
around a rod slightly smaller in diameter than
the crock peg; resurface the finger by move-
ment on an extra piece of fine emery cloth in a
manner simulating regular use.
14.9 For more convenient crock testing of
multiple strands of yarn or thread a dowel at-
tachment is useful. This attachment was de-
veloped to avoid the tendency of the standard
finger to dig into and push aside the yarns, or
slide off them and possibly give erroneous
results. This attachment is 25 mm in diameter
by 51 mm long. Positioned on its side and held
in place by the standard finger, it provides a
wider test area, and holds the white test square
by two spring loaded clips. For additional in-
formation on this development see the article
by C. R. Trommer, “Modification of the
AATCC Crockmeter for Yarn Testing,” Amer-
ican Dyestuff Reporter, Vol. 45, No. 12, June
4, 1956, p357; also see articles by S. Korpanty
and C. R. Trommer, “An Improved Crock-
meter for Yarn Testing,” American Dyestuff
Reporter, Vol. 48, No. 6, March 23, 1959, p40.
14.10 Experienced operators do not have to
repeat this weighing procedure during a test
session once the technique is established.
14.11 CAUTION: It has been reported that
the results for staining obtained by this
method on fabrics dyed to dark shades (navy,
black, etc.) that contain a combination of poly-
ester and spandex, or their blends, may not
show the full staining propensity of such fab-
rics in consumer use. It is, therefore, recom-
mended that the staining results obtained by
this test not be used for the acceptance testing
of such fabrics.
14.12 It has been noted that different grades
may result depending upon whether the
Gray Scale for Staining or AATCC 9-Step
Chromatic Transference Scale is used for the
evaluation. It is, therefore, important to report
which scale was used.
For very critical evaluations and in cases of
arbitration, grades must be based on the Gray
Scale for Staining.
14.13 An automated electronic grading sys-
tem may be used as long as the system has
been demonstrated to provide results that are
equal to and provide equal or better repeatabil-
ity and reproducibility than an experienced
grader performing visual evaluation.
14.14 The precision of this test method is
dependent on the combined variability of the
material being tested, the test method itself,
and the evaluation procedure utilized.
14.14.1 The precision statement in Section
13 was developed from results obtained by vi-
sual evaluation.
Table II—Critical Differences
For the components of variance in Table I, two averages of observed values should be considered
significantly different at the 95% probability level if the difference equals or exceeds the following critical
differences.
No. of
Observations
Dry Wet
Chromatic Gray Chromatic Gray
Single Operator/Rater 1
3
5
0.55
0.32
0.24
0.54
0.31
0.24
0.68
0.39
0.30
0.70
0.40
0.31
Within Laboratory 1
3
5
0.77
0.60
0.60
0.75
0.61
0.57
1.08
0.93
0.90
1.17
1.02
1.00
Between Laboratory 1
3
5
0.82
0.69
0.66
0.89
0.77
0.74
1.53
1.43
1.41
1.90
1.81
1.79
The critical differences were calculated using t = 1.96 which is based on infinite degrees of freedom.
Table III—Sample Crock Test Results
with Chromatic Scale
Dry Wet
Lab A 4.5 3.5
Lab B 4.0 1.5
Difference 0.5 2.0
Copyright The American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists
Provided by Accuris under license with AATCC
Licensee=Underwriters Laboratories - Ho Chi Ming City, Vie/5909636157, User=Le,
Not for Resale, 11/23/2023 20:10:19 MST
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from Accuris
--``,`,,,``,,```,`,,,,,,`````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---