NOTE 3—More detailed descriptions of these discontinuities can be
found in the article, “New Reference Radiographs for Magnesium Alloy
Castings,” by B. Lagowski, published in the Journal of Testing and
Evaluation, Vol 2, No. 4, July 1974.
3.2.9 shrinkage cavity, n—appears as a dendritic,
filamentary, or jagged darkened area.
3.2.10 shrinkage porosity or sponge (nonferrous alloys),
n—a localized lacy or honeycombed darkened area.
4. Significance and Use
4.1 Personnel utilizing reference radiographs to this stan-
dard shall be qualified and authorized to perform radiographic
interpretation in accordance with a nationally or internationally
recognized NDT personnel qualification practice or standard
such as ANSI/ASNT-CP-189, SNT-TC-1A, NAS 410, ISO
9712 or a similar document and certified by the employer or
certifying agency, as applicable. The practice or standard used
and its applicable revision shall be identified in the contractual
agreement between the using parties. A certified Level III shall
be available to assist with interpreting specifications and
product requirements as applied to the reference radiographs (if
the Level III is the radiographic interpreter, this may be the
same person).
4.2 These radiographs are intended for reference only but
are so designed that acceptance standards, which may be
developed for particular requirements, can be specified in
terms of these radiographs. The illustrations are radiographs of
castings that were produced under conditions designed to
develop the discontinuities. The radiographs of the
1
⁄
4
in.
(6.35 mm) castings are intended to be used in the thickness
range up to and including
1
⁄
2
in. (12.7 mm). The radiographs of
the
3
⁄
4
in. (19.1 mm) castings are intended to be used in the
thickness range of over
1
⁄
2
in. up to and including 2 in.
(51 mm). The grouping and system of designations are based
on considerations of the best practical means of making these
reference radiographs of the greatest possible value.
4.3 Film Deterioration—Radiographic films are subject to
wear and tear from handling and use. The extent to which the
image deteriorates over time is a function of storage
conditions, care in handling and amount of use. Reference
radiograph films are no exception and may exhibit a loss in
image quality over time. The radiographs should therefore be
periodically examined for signs of wear and tear, including
scratches, abrasions, stains, and so forth. Any reference radio-
graphs which show signs of excessive wear and tear which
could influence the interpretation and use of the radiographs
should be replaced.
5. Basis for Application
5.1 The reference radiographs may be applied as acceptance
standards tailored to the end use of the product. Application of
these reference radiographs as acceptance standards should be
based on the intended use of the product and the following
considerations (see Note 4).
5.1.1 Compare the production radiographs of the casting
submitted for evaluation with the reference radiographs appli-
cable to designated wall thickness in accordance with the
written acceptance criteria.
5.1.2 An area of like size to that of the reference radiograph
shall be the unit area by which the production radiograph is
evaluated, and any such area shall meet the requirements as
defined for acceptability.
5.1.3 Any combination or portion of these reference radio-
graphs may be used as is relevant to the particular application.
Different grades or acceptance limits may be specified for each
discontinuity type. Furthermore, different grades may be speci-
fied for different regions or zones of a component.
5.1.4 Special considerations may be required where more
than one discontinuity type is present in the same area. Any
modifications to the acceptance criteria required on the basis of
multiple discontinuity types shall be specified.
5.1.5 Where the reference radiographs provide only an
ungraded illustration of a discontinuity, acceptance criteria
may be specified by referencing a maximum discontinuity size,
or percentage of the discontinuity size illustrated.
5.1.6 Production radiographs showing porosity, gas,
shrinkage, or inclusions shall be evaluated by the overall
condition with regard to size, number, and distribution. The
aggregate size of discontinuities shall not exceed the total
accumulation in area of the discontinuities of the reference
radiograph. It is not the intent that the maximum size of the
illustrated discontinuity shall be the limiting size for a single
production radiographic discontinuity, or that the number of
discontinuities shown on the reference radiograph shall be the
limiting number for production radiographs. Also, caution
should be exercised in judging a large discontinuity against a
collection of small discontinuities on the basis of size alone.
Each of the factors of size, number, and distribution shall be
considered in balance. The purchaser may provide documented
specific methods of evaluation.
5.1.7 When the severity level of discontinuities per unit in
the production radiograph being evaluated is equal to or better
than the severity level in the specified reference radiograph,
that part of the casting represented by the production radio-
graph shall be acceptable. If the production radiograph shows
discontinuities per unit area of greater severity than the
reference radiograph, that part of the casting shall not be
accepted.
5.1.8 As a minimum, the acceptance criteria should contain
information addressing: zoning of the part (if applicable), the
acceptable severity level for each discontinuity type, and the
specified area to which the reference radiographs are to be
applied.
NOTE 4—Caution should be exercised in specifying the acceptance
criteria to be met in a casting. Casting design coupled with foundry
practice should be considered. It is advisable to consult with the
manufacturer/foundry before establishing the acceptance criteria to ensure
the desired quality level can be achieved.
6. Description
6.1 The radiographs listed in Table 1 illustrate each type of
discontinuity in eight grades. The radiographs listed in Table 2
illustrate each type of discontinuity in eight grades, with the
exception of pipe shrink, flow line, hot tear, and oxide
inclusion, where a single ungraded illustration is given for
each. Although eight grades of each discontinuity are shown
(with the above exceptions), a numerically smaller graded set
E155 − 20
3